From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Chris Mckenzie <Chris.McKenzie@entrust.com>
Cc: 'pgsql-performance@postgresql.org' <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 01:00:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20060502230001.GA7148@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE02FD24E5A7504FA1D53631DA8CEA9BF8B614@sottmxs10.entrust.com>
References: <DE02FD24E5A7504FA1D53631DA8CEA9BF8B614@sottmxs10.entrust.com>
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:40:41PM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote:
> I've got a quick and stupid question: Does Postgres 7.4 (7.x) support
> vacuum_cost_delay?
No, it does not; it was introduced in 8.0.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, Chris.McKenzie@entrust.com
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.
In-Reply-To: <20060502230001.GA7148@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox