pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:27:47 -0400
Message-ID: <20060504122747.GA21437@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE02FD24E5A7504FA1D53631DA8CEA9BF8B62E@sottmxs10.entrust.com>
References: <DE02FD24E5A7504FA1D53631DA8CEA9BF8B62E@sottmxs10.entrust.com>

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:47:15PM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote:
> I've come to the conclusion I need to simply start tracking all transactions
> and determining a cost/performance for the larger and frequently updated
> tables without the benefit and penalty of pg_statio.

I'll bet it won't help you.  If you can't get off 7.4 on a busy
machine, you're going to get hosed by I/O sometimes no matter what. 
My suggestion is to write a bunch of rule-of-thumb rules for your
cron jobs, and start planning your upgrade.

Jan back-patched the vacuum stuff to 7.4 for us (Afilias), and we
tried playing with it; but it didn't really make the difference we'd
hoped.

The reason for this is that 7.4 also doesn't have the bg_writer.  So
you're still faced with I/O storms, no matter what you do.  If I were
in your shoes, I wouldn't waste a lot of time on trying to emulate
the new features in 7.4.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism. 
                --Brad Holland



view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060504122747.GA21437@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
Permalink:  ../20060504122747.GA21437@phlogiston.dyndns.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060504122747.GA21437@phlogiston.dyndns.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
  Subject: Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.
  In-Reply-To: <20060504122747.GA21437@phlogiston.dyndns.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox