pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
To: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Cc: Christian Kratzer <ck@cksoft.de>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:36:32 +0200
Message-ID: <20060509103632.GD29652@svana.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.s893vzcpcigqcu@apollo13>
References: <445F7FF8.6070707@comcast.net>
	<1147110142.32369.7.camel@archimedes>
	<20060508175013.GY99570@pervasive.com>
	<28288.1147111196@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<op.s89zl30wcigqcu@apollo13>
	<20060509105214.P90693@vesihiisi.cksoft.de>
	<op.s8916gm6cigqcu@apollo13>
	<20060509113337.M90693@vesihiisi.cksoft.de>
	<op.s893vzcpcigqcu@apollo13>

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:10:37PM +0200, PFC wrote:
> 	Yes, but in this case temp tables add too much overhead. I wish 
> 	there  were RAM based temp tables like in mysql. However I guess the 
> current temp  table slowness comes from the need to mark their existence in 
> the system  catalogs or something. That's why I proposed using cursors...

It would be interesting to know what the bottleneck is for temp tables
for you. They do not go via the buffer-cache, they are stored in
private memory in the backend, they are not xlogged. Nor flushed to
disk on backend exit. They're about as close to in-memory tables as
you're going to get...

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 188B) download

view thread (44+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060509103632.GD29652@svana.org>
Permalink:  ../20060509103632.GD29652@svana.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060509103632.GD29652@svana.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: kleptog@svana.org, lists@peufeu.com, ck@cksoft.de, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
  In-Reply-To: <20060509103632.GD29652@svana.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox