From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Getting even more insert performance (250m+rows/day)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 22:13:50 +0200
Message-ID: <20060524201350.GB10918@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9E8E3745-64F2-4908-BF16-284CF7834760@geeklair.net>
References: <CE96DEF6-C455-4BB3-8B57-A78849A519E8@geeklair.net>
<20060524200349.GA10753@uio.no>
<9E8E3745-64F2-4908-BF16-284CF7834760@geeklair.net>
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:09:54PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> no warnings in the log (I did change the checkpoint settings when I
> set up the database, but didn't notice an appreciable difference in
> insert performance).
How about wal_buffers? Upping it might not help all that much if only one
thread is writing, but you might give it a try...
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com
Subject: Re: Getting even more insert performance (250m+rows/day)
In-Reply-To: <20060524201350.GB10918@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox