From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@mobart.hr>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: scaling up postgres
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 23:43:41 +0200
Message-ID: <20060611214341.GA10747@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150062140.23423.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <200606030931.k539V38Y007877@smtp2.planet.net.tn>
<20060603094355.GA23297@uio.no>
<1150062140.23423.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 11:42:20PM +0200, Mario Splivalo wrote:
> Could you point out to some more detailed reading on why Xeons are
> poorer choice than Opterons when used with PostgreSQL?
There are lots of theories, none conclusive, but the benchmarks certainly
point that way consistently. Read the list archives for the details.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, mario.splivalo@mobart.hr
Subject: Re: scaling up postgres
In-Reply-To: <20060611214341.GA10747@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox