From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
Cc: steve.poe@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:17:51 -0500
Message-ID: <20060613211751.GC34196@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448F1591.4000404@commandprompt.com>
References: <1150221760.12191.25.camel@amd64-gentoo-laptop>
<1150225202.29299.51.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
<448F1591.4000404@commandprompt.com>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:44:17PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> You can get extremely competitive quotes from IBM or HP as long as you
> say, "You are competing against Dell".
Possibly even more competitive from Sun...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, jd@commandprompt.com, smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, steve.poe@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
In-Reply-To: <20060613211751.GC34196@pervasive.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox