pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: Martin Lesser <ml-pgsql@bettercom.de>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:12:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200606142212.k5EMCm204045@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12097.1130610925@sss.pgh.pa.us>


Would someone please find the answer to Tom's last question?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Looking at this, I wonder if there isn't a bug or at least an
> > inefficiency in 8.1.  The KeysEqual short circuit tests are still there
> > in ri_triggers.c; aren't they now redundant with the test in triggers.c?
> > And don't they need to account for the special case mentioned in the
> > comment in triggers.c, that the RI check must still be done if we are
> > looking at a row updated by the same transaction that created it?
> 
> OK, I take back the possible-bug comment: the special case only applies
> to the FK-side triggers, which is to say RI_FKey_check, and that routine
> doesn't attempt to skip the check on equal old/new keys.  I'm still
> wondering though if the KeysEqual tests in the other RI triggers aren't
> now a waste of cycles.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +



view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200606142212.k5EMCm204045@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200606142212.k5EMCm204045@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200606142212.k5EMCm204045@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mike@fuhr.org, bruno@wolff.to, ml-pgsql@bettercom.de, sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com
  Subject: Re: Effects of cascading references in foreign keys
  In-Reply-To: <200606142212.k5EMCm204045@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox