pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <200606161624.k5GGO3N03466@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4492D882.6030109@kaltenbrunner.cc>

Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > OK, based on reports I have seen, generally stats_query_string adds 50%
> > to the total runtime of a "SELECT 1" query, and the patch reduces the
> > overhead to 25%.
> 
> that is actually not true for both of the platforms(a slow OpenBSD
> 3.9/x86 and a very fast Linux/x86_64) I tested on. Both of them show
> virtually no improvement with the patch and even worst it causes
> considerable (negative) variance on at least the Linux box.

I see the results I suggested on OpenBSD that you reported.

> OpenBSD 3.9-current/x86:
> 
> without stats:
>     0m6.79s real     0m1.56s user     0m1.12s system
> 
> -HEAD + stats:
>     0m10.44s real     0m2.26s user     0m1.22s system
> 
> -HEAD + stats + patch:
>     0m10.68s real     0m2.16s user     0m1.36s system

and I got similar results reported from a Debian:

	Linux 2.6.16 on a single processor HT 2.8Ghz Pentium compiled
	with gcc 4.0.4.

	> > real        0m3.306s
	> > real        0m4.905s
	> > real        0m4.448s

I am unclear on the cuase for the widely varying results you saw in
Debian.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +



view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200606161624.k5GGO3N03466@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200606161624.k5GGO3N03466@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200606161624.k5GGO3N03466@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc, zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
  In-Reply-To: <200606161624.k5GGO3N03466@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox