pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ioana Danes <ioanasoftware@yahoo.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Query plan issue when upgrading to postgres 8.14 (from postgres 8.12 or 7.4)
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:34:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20060706213446.99717.qmail@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com> (raw)

I have a problem with a query that in postgres 7.4  and 8.12 has an acceptable response time but in postgres 8.14 is very slow.
      
This is the table I use:
       
      create table  TEST (
      TESTID    INT8 not null,
      TESTTYPE  INT4     null,
      constraint  PK_TESTID primary key (TESTID));
      create index  IX_TEST_TESTTYPE on TEST (TESTTYPE);
       
And this is the query with the problem:
        explain select max(TESTID) from TEST where TESTTYPE = 1577;
       
The query plan in postgres 7.4 and 8.12 is using the  index by TESTTYPE field, which is what I want in this case.
      QUERY PLAN  
      Aggregate   (cost=25.97..25.97 rows=1 width=8)    
        ->  Index Scan using ix_test_testtype on  test  (cost=0.00..25.95 rows=9 width=8)    
              Index Cond:  (testtype = 1577)        
  With postgres 8.14 the query plan uses the primary  key PK_TESTID with filter by TESTTYPE, which  it takes almost 10 minutes to execute:
      QUERY PLAN  
      Limit  (cost=0.00..41.46  rows=1 width=8)    
        ->  Index Scan Backward using pk_testid on  test  (cost=…)    
              Filter: ((testid IS  NOT NULL) and (testtype = 1577))
       
When replacing the index 
     create index IX_TEST_TESTTYPE on TEST (TESTTYPE);
with 
     create index IX_TEST_TESTTYPE on TEST (TESTTYPE, TESTID);
the query plan uses this index and the execution of this select is  extremely fast. 
       
From what I can see, the query plan for 8.14 is using a index scan  by the field used with max() function with a filter by the field in the where  condition.
Should not the query plan use an index scan by the field in where  condition (which in my case is a small range) and come up with the max value in that range?
       
Is this a bug, am I missing a configuration step or this is how it  is supposed to work? 
       
Thank you very much,
Ioana 


 		
---------------------------------
 All new Yahoo! Mail - 
---------------------------------
Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane.

view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060706213446.99717.qmail@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Permalink:  ../20060706213446.99717.qmail@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060706213446.99717.qmail@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ioanasoftware@yahoo.ca
  Subject: Re: Query plan issue when upgrading to postgres 8.14 (from postgres 8.12 or 7.4)
  In-Reply-To: <20060706213446.99717.qmail@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox