pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kenji Morishige <kenjim@juniper.net>
To: Thomas F. O'Connell <tfo@sitening.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: kenjim@juniper.net
Subject: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:07:45 -0700
Message-ID: <20060808220745.GC6418@juniper.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9EE66C7F-0B04-4472-9EBD-CD567AC9EA1D@sitening.com>
References: <20060808204354.GN29379@juniper.net>
	<44D906E1.7010405@commandprompt.com>
	<9EE66C7F-0B04-4472-9EBD-CD567AC9EA1D@sitening.com>

The 1+0 on the WAL is better than on PGDATA? I guess I'm confused about the
write sequence of the data. I will research more, thank you!
-Kenji

On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:59:09PM -0500, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
> 
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> >>I am considering a setup such as this:
> >>  - At least dual cpu (possibly with 2 cores each)
> >>  - 4GB of RAM
> >>  - 2 disk RAID 1 array for root disk
> >>  - 4 disk RAID 1+0 array for PGDATA
> >>  - 2 disk RAID 1 array for pg_xlog
> >>Does anyone know a vendor that might be able provide such setup?
> 
> Wouldn't it be preferable to put WAL on a multi-disk RAID 10 if you  
> had the opportunity? This gives you the redundancy of RAID 1 but  
> approaches the performance of RAID 0, especially as you add disks to  
> the array. In benchmarking, I've seen consistent success with this  
> approach.
> 
> --
> Thomas F. O'Connell
> Sitening, LLC
> 
> http://www.sitening.com/
> 3004B Poston Avenue
> Nashville, TN 37203-1314
> 615-469-5150 x802
> 615-469-5151 (fax)



view thread (27+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20060808220745.GC6418@juniper.net>
Permalink:  ../20060808220745.GC6418@juniper.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20060808220745.GC6418@juniper.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: kenjim@juniper.net, tfo@sitening.com
  Subject: Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
  In-Reply-To: <20060808220745.GC6418@juniper.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox