pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, "Bucky Jordan" <bjordan@lumeta.com>
Cc: Joshua Marsh <icub3d@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hints proposal
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:59:20 -0400
Message-ID: <200610181259.21389.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14539.1161140129@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D4209C9A@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com>
	<200610172240.20142.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<14539.1161140129@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Tuesday 17 October 2006 22:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > When it happens it tends to look something like this:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-01/msg00154.php
> >
> > Funny that for all the people who claim that improving the planner should
> > be the primary goal that no one ever took interest in the above case.
>
> Well, you didn't provide sufficient data for anyone else to reproduce
> the problem ...
>

Geez Tom, cut me some slack... no one even bothered to respond that that post 
with a "hey we can't tell cause we need more information"...  

not that it matters because here is where I reposted the problem with more 
information  
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-01/msg00248.php
where you'll note that Josh agreed with my thinking that there was an issue 
with the planner and he specifically asked for comments from you.  

And here is where I reposted the problem to -bugs
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-01/msg00134.php where I make 
note of discussing this with several other people, got Bruce to hazard a 
guess which was debunked, and where I noted to Bruce about 10 days later that 
there had been no further action and no one had asked for the _sample 
database_ I was able to put together. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL



view thread (74+ messages)

Message-ID: <200610181259.21389.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Permalink:  ../200610181259.21389.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200610181259.21389.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: xzilla@users.sourceforge.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bjordan@lumeta.com, icub3d@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Hints proposal
  In-Reply-To: <200610181259.21389.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox