From: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
To: jungmin shin <jungmin.shin@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UDF and cache
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:16:54 -0500
Message-ID: <20061018211654.GD85041@nasby.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd77360b0610181415j2600c09fv973107396491ca7f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cd77360b0610181415j2600c09fv973107396491ca7f@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 05:15:13PM -0400, jungmin shin wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I read a paper, which is Query optimization in the presence of Foreign
> Functions.
> And the paper , there is a paragraph like below.
>
> In order to reduce the number of invocations, caching the results of
> invocation was suggested in Postgres.
>
> I'd like to know in detail about how postgres is maintaing the cache of
> UDFs.
It's not. See list archives for past discussions.
--
Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jim@nasby.net, jungmin.shin@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UDF and cache
In-Reply-To: <20061018211654.GD85041@nasby.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox