From: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
To: Shane Ambler <pgsql@007Marketing.com>
Cc: Ben Suffolk <ben@vanilla.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: New hardware thoughts
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:47:09 -0500
Message-ID: <20061023214708.GV26892@nasby.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4538E073.7050802@007Marketing.com>
References: <0D8823B6-2A2D-40BA-B207-9DA0D50EDFB6@vanilla.net>
<4538E073.7050802@007Marketing.com>
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:12:59AM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
> Generally more disks at slower speed - 2 10K disks in raid 0 is faster
> than 1 15K disk. More disks also allow more options.
Not at writing they're not (unless you're using RAID0... ugh).
--
Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jim@nasby.net, pgsql@007Marketing.com, ben@vanilla.net
Subject: Re: New hardware thoughts
In-Reply-To: <20061023214708.GV26892@nasby.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox