From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: When to vacuum a table?
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:11:47 +0100
Message-ID: <20061126131147.GA4089@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c13f2d590611260443m619cd825x912b262aef5162f9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1164540257.7902.0.camel@panoramix>
<c13f2d590611260443m619cd825x912b262aef5162f9@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:43:11AM -0300, Marcelo Costa wrote:
> All its tables constantly manipulated (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) they need a
> VACUUM
Just a minor clarification here: INSERT does not create dead rows, only
UPDATE and DELETE do. Thus, if you only insert rows, you do not need to
vacuum (although you probably need to analyze).
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com
Subject: Re: When to vacuum a table?
In-Reply-To: <20061126131147.GA4089@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox