From: A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance of ORDER BY
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:20:28 +0100
Message-ID: <20061205182027.GA14718@a-kretschmer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7090.1165341726@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <4575A863.6040504@varianinc.com>
<7090.1165341726@sss.pgh.pa.us>
am Tue, dem 05.12.2006, um 13:02:06 -0500 mailte Tom Lane folgendes:
> In 8.0 that might be counterproductively high --- we have seen cases
> where more sort_mem = slower with the older sorting code. I concur
> with Luke's advice that you should update to 8.2 (not 8.1) to get the
> improved sorting code.
Hey, yes, 8.2 is released! Great, and thanks to all the people, which
help to develop this great software.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47215, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com
Subject: Re: Performance of ORDER BY
In-Reply-To: <20061205182027.GA14718@a-kretschmer.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox