From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: Postgresql Performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:56:35 -0500
Message-ID: <20061212125633.GB29167@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061212124803.GA29167@mathom.us>
References: <C1A31C39.15548%llonergan@greenplum.com>
<457EA39E.1020207@streppone.it>
<20061212124803.GA29167@mathom.us>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:48:06AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
>I'd be curious to see -O2 with and without the arch-specific flags,
>since that's mostly what the discussion is about.
That came across more harshly than I intended; I apologize for that.
It's certainly a useful data point to compare the various optimization
levels.
I'm rerunning the tests with gcc 4.1.2 and another platform to see if
that makes any difference.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
In-Reply-To: <20061212125633.GB29167@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox