pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:06:56 -0500
Message-ID: <20061216000655.GI29167@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1GvGo0-0004Hv-Em@elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <BCA64E3D-E764-432B-82CB-C2FC75CF3104@purefiction.net>
	<E1Gv0ko-0004Ht-Jx@elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<CA660CCB-712C-442F-A48D-4152EF0EFF01@purefiction.net>
	<E1Gv3Rc-0007M7-5X@elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<09D6591B-4AA9-4994-BED6-0C7C583BF933@purefiction.net>
	<E1GvBfR-0005f3-11@elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<b42b73150612150623s761783c8l9093b2637a1f0c6c@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1GvEcS-0005rM-ME@elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<b42b73150612150755s9d843f8j972f36599cf9b4dd@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1GvGo0-0004Hv-Em@elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:24:46PM -0500, Ron wrote:
>ATM, the most we can say is that in a number of systems with modest 
>physical IO subsystems 


So I reran it on a 3.2GHz xeon with 6G RAM off a ramdisk; I/O ain't the 
bottleneck on that one. Results didn't show didn't show any signficant 
gains regardless of compilation options (results hovered around 12k 
tps). If people want to continue this, I will point out that they should 
make sure they're linked against the optimized libpq rather than an 
existing one elsewhere in the library path. Beyond that, I'm done with 
this thread. Maybe there are some gains to be found somewhere, but the 
testing done thus far (while limited) is sufficient, IMO, to demonstrate 
that compiler options aren't going to provide a blow-your-socks-off 
dramatic performance improvement.

Mike Stone



view thread (124+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20061216000655.GI29167@mathom.us>
Permalink:  ../20061216000655.GI29167@mathom.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20061216000655.GI29167@mathom.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
  Subject: Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
  In-Reply-To: <20061216000655.GI29167@mathom.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox