From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Galy Lee <lee.galy@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: how to plan for vacuum?
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:52:02 -0300
Message-ID: <20070125035202.GI26006@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070125033917.GD64372@nasby.net>
References: <45B6F0A8.1050705@oss.ntt.co.jp>
<20070125033917.GD64372@nasby.net>
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I'll generally start with a cost delay of 20ms and adjust based on IO
> utilization.
I've been considering set a default autovacuum cost delay to 10ms; does
this sound reasonable?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, jim@nasby.net, lee.galy@oss.ntt.co.jp, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: how to plan for vacuum?
In-Reply-To: <20070125035202.GI26006@alvh.no-ip.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox