From: Brian Herlihy <btherl@yahoo.com.au>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Querying distinct values from a large table
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20070130143811.85540.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
As I understand, there's no hashing for DISTINCT, but there is for GROUP BY. GROUP BY will choose between a hash and a sort (or maybe other options?) depending on the circumstances. So you can write
SELECT a, b FROM tbl GROUP BY a,b
and the sort/unique part of the query may run faster.
Brian
----- Original Message ----
From: Chad Wagner <chad.wagner@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Igor Lobanov <ilobanov@swsoft.com>; Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Tuesday, 30 January, 2007 10:13:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Querying distinct values from a large table
On 1/30/07, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> explain analyze select distinct a, b from tbl
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output is:
>
> Unique (cost=500327.32..525646.88 rows=1848 width=6) (actual
> time=52719.868..56126.356 rows=5390 loops=1)
> -> Sort (cost=500327.32..508767.17 rows=3375941 width=6) (actual
> time=52719.865..54919.989 rows=3378864 loops=1)
> Sort Key: a, b
> -> Seq Scan on tbl (cost=0.00..101216.41
rows=3375941
> width=6) (actual time=16.643..20652.610 rows=3378864 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 57307.394 ms
All your time is in the sort, not in the SeqScan.
Increase your work_mem.
Sounds like an opportunity to implement a "Sort Unique" (sort of like a hash, I guess), there is no need to push 3M rows through a sort algorithm to only shave it down to 1848 unique records.
I am assuming this optimization just isn't implemented in PostgreSQL?
--
Chad
http://www.postgresqlforums.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: btherl@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: Querying distinct values from a large table
In-Reply-To: <20070130143811.85540.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox