From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net>
Subject: Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:01:01 +0100
Message-ID: <20070223200101.GA9888@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070223195318.GG20242@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <45DF3B15.1070609@3times25.net>
<20070223193854.GA9763@uio.no>
<20070223195318.GG20242@alvh.no-ip.org>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:53:18PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> It's slightly unfortunate that AMD and Intel cling to the Opteron and Xeon
>> names even though they're making significant architecture changes, but that's
>> life, I guess.
> AFAIR Intel has been calling their server processors Xeon since Pentium
> Pro's, at least.
Yes, that was sort of my point. :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, esoteric@3times25.net
Subject: Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem
In-Reply-To: <20070223200101.GA9888@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox