pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Parallel Vacuum
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:35:53 +0100
Message-ID: <200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> (raw)

Folks,

is there any constrains/problems/etc. to run several vacuum processes in
parallel while each one is 'vaccuming' one different table?

Example:

  vacuum -d db1 -t table1 &
  vacuum -d db1 -t table2 &
  vacuum -d db1 -t table3 &
  wait

(sorry if it was already asked, but I did not find an explicit
answer in archives)

Thanks for any inputs!

Rgds,
-Dimitri



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: dimitrik.fr@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum
  In-Reply-To: <200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox