From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Equivalents in PostgreSQL of MySQL's "ENGINE=MEMORY" "MAX_ROWS=1000"
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:00:45 -0700
Message-ID: <200704031300.46013@hal.medialogik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E03A51A8-4E4E-4975-A05F-AACB9791E326@themactionfaction.com>
References: <4612A421.4060808@andromeiberica.com>
<4612AD87.1040406@netsyncro.com>
<E03A51A8-4E4E-4975-A05F-AACB9791E326@themactionfaction.com>
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:47, "A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2007, at 15:39 , C. Bergström wrote:
> I would like to use transactional semantics over tables that can
> disappear whenever the server fails. memcached does not offer that.
How would temporary tables?
--
Ginsberg's Theorem:
1) You can't win.
2) You can't break even.
3) You can't quit the game.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ahodgson@simkin.ca
Subject: Re: Equivalents in PostgreSQL of MySQL's "ENGINE=MEMORY" "MAX_ROWS=1000"
In-Reply-To: <200704031300.46013@hal.medialogik.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox