From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:09:30 -0400
Message-ID: <20070530150928.GC1785@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF804382037@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com>
References: <20070530142556.GB1785@mathom.us>
<C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF804382037@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com>
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:36:48AM -0400, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> I don't see how that's better at all; in fact, it reduces to
>> exactly the same problem: given two pieces of data which
>> disagree, which is right?
>
>The one that matches the checksum.
And you know the checksum is good, how?
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
In-Reply-To: <20070530150928.GC1785@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox