From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Gauri Kanekar <meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance Problem
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:16:45 +0200
Message-ID: <20070605131645.GA6051@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e4ba9550706050253o5d7048c3vbe755eb7fc85d298@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7e4ba9550706050226u7c2aa291he77dbfbeb90ce815@mail.gmail.com>
<7e4ba9550706050253o5d7048c3vbe755eb7fc85d298@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:23:35PM +0530, Gauri Kanekar wrote:
> Befor doing vaccum full on the database this query use to take less
> than 4min. But now after doing vacumming reindexing the tables it is
> taking 73mins.
Did you analyze the table recently? Some of the selectivity estimates seem
quite a bit off -- you could try raising the statistics target.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Performance Problem
In-Reply-To: <20070605131645.GA6051@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox