pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:06:09 +0200
Message-ID: <20070605220609.GA9835@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10525.1181080765@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <C289C6B1.A63%tandrews@soliantconsulting.com>
	<1180980943.31471.322.camel@archimedes>
	<46645DD9.7030805@soliantconsulting.com>
	<877iqjmro5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
	<46647427.4030103@g2switchworks.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0706041631490.11737@asgard.lang.hm>
	<466593E5.1010904@g2switchworks.com>
	<87sl96z0wf.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0706051325500.24361@asgard.lang.hm>
	<10525.1181080765@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:59:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the main argument for partitioning is when you are interested in
> being able to drop whole partitions cheaply.

Wasn't there also talk about adding the ability to mark individual partitions
as read-only, thus bypassing MVCC and allowing queries to be satisfied using
indexes only?

Not that I think I've seen it on the TODO... :-)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/



view thread (36+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20070605220609.GA9835@uio.no>
Permalink:  ../20070605220609.GA9835@uio.no/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20070605220609.GA9835@uio.no

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com
  Subject: Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?
  In-Reply-To: <20070605220609.GA9835@uio.no>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox