From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WALL on controller without battery?
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:36:20 -0400
Message-ID: <20070711153620.GP1241@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1184165284.909164.90107.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
References: <cone.1184165284.909164.90107.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:48:04AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> The question is, would I be better off putting WAL on the second, OS,
> controller or in the 8 port controller? Specially since the 2 port will not
> have battery (3ware does not have 2 ports with battery).
Put the WAL where the battery is. Even if it's slower (and I don't
know whether it will be), I assume that having the right data more
slowly is better than maybe not having the data at all, quickly.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
--Roger Brinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: WALL on controller without battery?
In-Reply-To: <20070711153620.GP1241@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox