From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: insert vs select into performance
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:51:50 -0400
Message-ID: <20070723115147.GJ12481@mathom.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <469E664A.2010205@ifi.uio.no>
References: <469D1AD3.9030004@ifi.uio.no>
<469D1E4F.5090805@tweakers.net>
<469D2E1B.1090100@ifi.uio.no>
<20070718113249.GI12481@mathom.us>
<469E664A.2010205@ifi.uio.no>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:13:14PM +0200, Thomas Finneid wrote:
>Michael Stone wrote:
>>I don't understand how the insert you described is table to table?
>
>SELECT INTO is table to table, so is INSERT INTO SELECT FROM.
I could have sworn that at least one of the examples you gave didn't
have any select. Doesn't really matter.
Mike Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mstone+postgres@mathom.us
Subject: Re: insert vs select into performance
In-Reply-To: <20070723115147.GJ12481@mathom.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox