From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Michael Ben-Nes <miki@epoch.co.il>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:43:47 +0200
Message-ID: <20070816164347.GB32094@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3be18fa0708160126i62a857d6ubd993546bc3c197b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f3be18fa0708160126i62a857d6ubd993546bc3c197b@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:26:52AM +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> Does any one have any experience with RAID 10 & perc 5/i ?
Without having done PostgreSQL benchmarking, we have a 2950 with four SATA
disks in RAID 10 (and two SAS disks in RAID 1), and have not seen any
performance issues.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, miki@epoch.co.il
Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
In-Reply-To: <20070816164347.GB32094@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox