pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
To: tyrrill_ed@emc.com
Cc: miki@epoch.co.il
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:41:00 -0500
Message-ID: <20070816224059.GR54309@nasby.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C7C0B0734F87445AFC8B63EDCC4901E015717A7@CORPUSMX60C.corp.emc.com>
References: <f3be18fa0708160126i62a857d6ubd993546bc3c197b@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C7C0B0734F87445AFC8B63EDCC4901E015717A7@CORPUSMX60C.corp.emc.com>

On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:30:11PM -0400, tyrrill_ed@emc.com wrote:
> Hi Miki,
> by 40%.  I have not tried RAID 10 so I cannot help you there.  My
> suggestion is test both RAID 5 and RAID 10, and report back to us what
> you find.

Unless you're running something like a data warehouse, I'd put a real
low priority on testing RAID5... it's rarely a good idea for a database.
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

view thread (12+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20070816224059.GR54309@nasby.net>
Permalink:  ../20070816224059.GR54309@nasby.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20070816224059.GR54309@nasby.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: decibel@decibel.org, tyrrill_ed@emc.com, miki@epoch.co.il
  Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
  In-Reply-To: <20070816224059.GR54309@nasby.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox