From: Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
To: Ben Perrault <ben@mail.creepingfur.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Poor Performance after Upgrade
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 06:24:25 +0200
Message-ID: <20070822042425.GA22037@uio.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070820220028.X19220@mail.creepingfur.org>
References: <20070820220028.X19220@mail.creepingfur.org>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:17:14PM -0700, Ben Perrault wrote:
> -> Nested Loop (cost=100000000.00..106559138.00 rows=336
> width=137)
This sounds very much like you're trying to force the planner. Did you set
enable_nestloop=false or something? Are there any other non-default settings
that could negatively impact planner performance?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sgunderson@bigfoot.com, ben@mail.creepingfur.org
Subject: Re: Poor Performance after Upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20070822042425.GA22037@uio.no>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox