From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:56:41 -0800
Message-ID: <200711081256.41880@hal.medialogik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711082114.36788.dfontaine@hi-media.com>
References: <82607932-FC46-4B73-BF78-2290EE55F7F5@pvv.ntnu.no>
<dcc563d10711081022i9a8a64fg2fe00e6159027426@mail.gmail.com>
<200711082114.36788.dfontaine@hi-media.com>
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
> Is raid6 better than raid10 in term of overall performances, or a better
> cut when you need capacity more than throughput?
You can't touch RAID 10 for performance or reliability. The only reason to
use RAID 5 or RAID 6 is to get more capacity out of the same drives.
--
Alan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ahodgson@simkin.ca
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
In-Reply-To: <200711081256.41880@hal.medialogik.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox