From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:39:50 -0800
Message-ID: <200711141439.50418@hal.medialogik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711141435010.30192@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com>
References: <82607932-FC46-4B73-BF78-2290EE55F7F5@pvv.ntnu.no>
<200711141424.24078@hal.medialogik.com>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711141435010.30192@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com>
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>
wrote:
> > OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10
> > performance, but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try
> > an Areca controller in next storage server.
>
> I believe these were both on ext3. I thought I had some XFS results
> available for comparison, but I couldn't find them.
Yeah I've seen ext3 write performance issues on RAID-10. XFS is much better.
--
Q: Why did God create economists?
A: In order to make weather forecasters look good.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ahodgson@simkin.ca
Subject: Re: dell versus hp
In-Reply-To: <200711141439.50418@hal.medialogik.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox