From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
To: Gábor Farkas <gabor@nekomancer.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: autovacuum: recommended?
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:45:41 +0100
Message-ID: <20071116094541.GA5177@depesz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473D659B.1070008@nekomancer.net>
References: <473D659B.1070008@nekomancer.net>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:40:43AM +0100, Gábor Farkas wrote:
> we are moving one database from postgresql-7.4 to postgresql-8.2.4.
any particular reason why not 8.2.5?
>
> my question is: is it recommended to use it? or in other words, should i
> only use autovacuum? or it's better to use manual-vacuuming? which one
> is the "way of the future" :) ? or should i use both auto-vacuum and
> manual-vacuum?
autovacuum is definitely prefered (for most of the cases).
you might want to set vacuum delays though.
depesz
--
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: depesz@depesz.com, gabor@nekomancer.net
Subject: Re: autovacuum: recommended?
In-Reply-To: <20071116094541.GA5177@depesz.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox