pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:59:21 -0800
Message-ID: <20071219105921.07b45a36@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0712191322410.29296@westnet.com>
References: <476908BB.5090408@stuartbishop.net>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0712191322410.29296@westnet.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:50:29 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:

> > With PG 8.2 and 8.3, is it still pretty much limited to 8 cores
> > making 2 of the quad core Xeons redundant or detrimental?
> 
> Where'd you get the idea 8 cores was a limit?  As cores go up
> eventually you run out of disk or memory bandwidth, but how that
> plays out is very application dependant and there's no hard line
> anywhere.

Actually this is not true. Although I have yet to test 8.3. It is
pretty much common knowledge that after 8 cores the acceleration of
performance drops with PostgreSQL...

This has gotten better every release. 8.1 for example handles 8 cores
very well, 8.0 didn't and 7.4 well.... :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHaWoJATb/zqfZUUQRAgMeAJ9RS7BLAowXpJTbXuufJhIATj9gaACgrH6x
LRVDPbyIvn71ANra2yiXmgY=
=8QVl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20071219105921.07b45a36@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../20071219105921.07b45a36@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20071219105921.07b45a36@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com, stuart@stuartbishop.net
  Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
  In-Reply-To: <20071219105921.07b45a36@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox