pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>
Subject: Re: count * performance issue
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:27:35 -0800
Message-ID: <200803071727.36146.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18451.1204824562@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <f966c2ee0803052142l6a105678jfe2da92a0d9371@mail.gmail.com>
	<47D00DB2.7040007@emolecules.com>
	<18451.1204824562@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Tom,

> > Count() on Oracle and MySQL is almost instantaneous, even for very
> > large tables. So why can't Postgres do what they do?
>
> AFAIK the above claim is false for Oracle.  They have the same
> transactional issues we do.

Nope.  Oracle's MVCC is implemented through rollback segments, rather than 
non-overwriting the way ours is.  So Oracle can just do a count(*) on the 
index, then check the rollback segment for any concurrent 
update/delete/insert activity and adjust the count.  This sucks if there's 
a *lot* of concurrent activity, but in the usual case it's pretty fast.

I've been thinking that when we apply the Dead Space Map we might be able 
to get a similar effect in PostgreSQL.  That is, just do a count over the 
index, and visit only the heap pages flagged in the DSM.  Again, for a 
heavily updated table this wouldn't have any benefit, but for most cases 
it would be much faster.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco



view thread (62+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200803071727.36146.josh@agliodbs.com>
Permalink:  ../200803071727.36146.josh@agliodbs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200803071727.36146.josh@agliodbs.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, craig_james@emolecules.com
  Subject: Re: count * performance issue
  In-Reply-To: <200803071727.36146.josh@agliodbs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox