From: Josh Rovero <rovero@sonalysts.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: 8.3.1 vs 8.2.X on HP-UX PA-RISC 11.11/11.23
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:40:20 -0400
Message-ID: <20080612014020.431ffdde@mail.sonalysts.com> (raw)
We run GCC-compiled postgresql on a number
of HP-UX and Linux boxes.
Our measurements to date show 8.3.1
performance to be about 30% *worse*
than 8.2 on HP-UX for the same "drink the firehose"
insert/update/delete benchmarks. Linux
performance is fine.
Tweaking the new 8.3.1 synchronous_commit
and bg writer delays that *should* speed
things up actually makes them a bit worse,
again only on HP-UX PA-RISK 11.11 and 11.23.
Right now it's 32 bit, both for 8.2 and 8.3.
Any hints?
P. J. Rovero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: rovero@sonalysts.com
Subject: Re: 8.3.1 vs 8.2.X on HP-UX PA-RISC 11.11/11.23
In-Reply-To: <20080612014020.431ffdde@mail.sonalysts.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox