pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:27:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20080625182704.GN37604@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486242F4.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>
References: <48622660.4050403@careerjunction.co.za>
	<dcc563d10806250853t7eace772wc8cf71dd7d5bbd6c@mail.gmail.com>
	<1214409331.28228.8.camel@jd-laptop>
	<b42b73150806251035g1a2b98c2j7ca9bfe7bdbb1919@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080625180029.GM37604@commandprompt.com>
	<486242F4.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 01:07:25PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>  
> It doesn't have to be free software to cut that way.  I've actually
> found the free software to waste less of my time.  

No question.  But one of the unfortunate facts of the
no-charge-for-licenses world is that many people expect the systems to
be _really free_.  It appears that some people think, because they've
already paid $smallfortune for a license, it's therefore ok to pay
another amount in operation costs and experts to run the system.  Free
systems, for some reason, are expected also magically to run
themselves.  This tendency is getting better, but hasn't gone away.
It's partly because the budget for the administrators is often buried
in the overall large system budget, so nobody balks when there's a big
figure attached there.  When you present a budget for "free software"
that includes the cost of a few administrators, the accounting people
want to know why the free software costs so much.  

> If you depend on your systems, though, you should never deploy any
> change, no matter how innocuous it seems, without testing.

I agree completely.

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/



view thread (32+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20080625182704.GN37604@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../20080625182704.GN37604@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20080625182704.GN37604@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ajs@commandprompt.com
  Subject: Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
  In-Reply-To: <20080625182704.GN37604@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox