From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: The state of PG replication in 2008/Q2?
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:13:33 -0700
Message-ID: <200808211413.33968@hal.medialogik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48ADABAF.8030602@drivefaster.net>
References: <48ADABAF.8030602@drivefaster.net>
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Dan Harris <fbsd@drivefaster.net> wrote:
> Especially since we make frequent use of sequences in our databases. If
> MM is too difficult, I'm willing to accept a hot-standby read-only
> system that will handle queries until we can fix whatever ails the
> master.
A heartbeat+DRBD solution might make more sense than database-level
replication to achieve this.
--
Alan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ahodgson@simkin.ca
Subject: Re: The state of PG replication in 2008/Q2?
In-Reply-To: <200808211413.33968@hal.medialogik.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox