pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:10:24 +0100
Message-ID: <20081123081024.GA7443@tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gg9pg7$1edv$2@news.hub.org>
References: <gg9pg7$1edv$2@news.hub.org>

Andrus <kobruleht2@hot.ee> schrieb:

> There are  indexes on   rid(dokumnr) and dok(dokumnr) and dokumnr is int.
> Instead of using single key index, 8.1.4 scans over whole rid table.
> Sometimes idtelluued can contain more than single row so replacing join 
> with equality is not possible.
>
> How to fix ?
>
> Andrus.
>
> CREATE TEMP TABLE idtellUued(dokumnr INT) ON COMMIT DROP;
> INSERT INTO idtellUued VALUES(1249228);
> explain analyze  select 1
>   from dok JOIN rid USING(dokumnr)
> JOIN idtellUued USING(dokumnr)
>
> "Hash Join  (cost=7483.22..222259.77 rows=5706 width=0) (actual  
> time=14905.981..27065.903 rows=8 loops=1)"
> "  Hash Cond: ("outer".dokumnr = "inner".dokumnr)"
> "  ->  Seq Scan on rid  (cost=0.00..198240.33 rows=3295833 width=4) 
> (actual time=0.036..15021.641 rows=3280576 loops=1)"

How many rows contains rid? The estimation are okay, rows=3295833 and
actual rows=3280576 are nearly identical. An index-scan makes only sense
if rid contains considerable more than 3000000 rows.


Andreas
-- 
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.                              (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly."   (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe.              N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20081123081024.GA7443@tux>
Permalink:  ../20081123081024.GA7443@tux/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20081123081024.GA7443@tux

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: akretschmer@spamfence.net
  Subject: Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
  In-Reply-To: <20081123081024.GA7443@tux>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox