pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Trigger function, bad performance
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:08:02 +0100
Message-ID: <20081205110801.GC25227@a-kretschmer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <595F977C01388944A4B5158975BB676385AC6B@sgzhmailbox.ggrz-hagen.nrw.de>
References: <595F977C01388944A4B5158975BB676385ABFD@sgzhmailbox.ggrz-hagen.nrw.de>
	<D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C202D671B6@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at>
	<595F977C01388944A4B5158975BB676385AC6B@sgzhmailbox.ggrz-hagen.nrw.de>

am  Fri, dem 05.12.2008, um 11:41:11 +0100 mailte Rogatzki Rainer folgendes:
>   -- Example with bad performance since index isn't used
>   explain 
>   select c.id_country, sum(c.cost) as sum_cost
>   from costs c, accounting_interval a
>   where c.id_user = 123
>   and c.id_state = 1
>   and a.id = 1
>   and date(c.request) between a.p_begin and a.p_until
>   group by id_country;
> 
>   -- Example with invoked index (100 times better performance)
>   explain 
>   select c.id_country, sum(c.cost) as sum_cost
>   from costs c
>   where c.id_user = 123
>   and c.id_state = 1
>   and date(c.request) between '2007-01-01'::date and '2007-01-31'::date
>   group by id_country;
> 
> Here I cannot see why statement preparation has an effect at all.

The planner don't know the parameters at compile-time. Because of this
fakt, the planner choose a other plan (a seq-scan).

You can try to use execute 'your query'. In this case the planner
investigate a new plan, and (maybe) with the index.


Andreas
-- 
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt:  Heynitz: 035242/47150,   D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID:   0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA   http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20081205110801.GC25227@a-kretschmer.de>
Permalink:  ../20081205110801.GC25227@a-kretschmer.de/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20081205110801.GC25227@a-kretschmer.de

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com
  Subject: Re: Trigger function, bad performance
  In-Reply-To: <20081205110801.GC25227@a-kretschmer.de>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox