pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Rick <richard.branton@ca.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:08:20 -0400
Message-ID: <20100501030820.GI3151@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BDB5ECE.4010607@agliodbs.com>
References: <c2d2b6cf-895f-4a4b-aa8b-3adaac33c794@z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
	<y2g603c8f071004221155h3874a3c0ybbe2c790e3c1bf80@mail.gmail.com>
	<65d9d15d-41d2-4bfa-8cc3-6148b4fb9022@z3g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
	<h2o603c8f071004271755v3e56a408hbd23b5c355058aa@mail.gmail.com>
	<4BDB5ECE.4010607@agliodbs.com>

Josh Berkus escribió:

> #autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.2
> 
> This is set because in my experience, 20% bloat is about the level at
> which bloat starts affecting performance; thus, we want to vacuum at
> that level but not sooner.  This does mean that very large tables which
> never have more than 10% updates/deletes don't get vacuumed at all until
> freeze_age; this is a *good thing*. VACUUM on large tables is expensive;
> you don't *want* to vacuum a billion-row table which has only 100,000
> updates.

Hmm, now that we have partial vacuum, perhaps we should revisit this.


> It would be worth doing a DBT2/DBT5 test run with different autovac
> settings post-8.4 so see if we should specifically change the vacuum
> threshold.

Right.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.



view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20100501030820.GI3151@alvh.no-ip.org>
Permalink:  ../20100501030820.GI3151@alvh.no-ip.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20100501030820.GI3151@alvh.no-ip.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, josh@agliodbs.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, richard.branton@ca.com
  Subject: Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters
  In-Reply-To: <20100501030820.GI3151@alvh.no-ip.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox