pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gnuoytr@rcn.com
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Useless sort by
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:05:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20100922230531.ALE43726@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=VJXvNS_ysdNQOts2OiZVr-HfRgLS=qv25FoqE@mail.gmail.com>
References: <i6ks04$2jet$1@news.hub.org>
	<12103.1284389088@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<4C8E4982.70004@gmail.com>
	<14518.1284396487@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AANLkTi=RqV1Q-zJW2+JP3PBaQb4mxPz9ZS9BL_fCsG3Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=VJXvNS_ysdNQOts2OiZVr-HfRgLS=qv25FoqE@mail.gmail.com>



---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:54:22 -0400
>From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org (on behalf of Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Useless sort by  
>To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola@gmail.com>
>Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>
>On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Gaetano Mendola <mendola@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I see your point, but some functions like:  unique, count are not affected
>> by the order of values fed, and I don't think either that unique has to
>> give out the unique values in the same fed order.
>
>Gee, I'd sure expect it to.

Spoken like a dyed in the wool COBOL coder.  The RM has no need for order; it's set based.  I've dabbled in PG for some time, and my sense is increasingly that PG developers are truly code oriented, not database (set) oriented.  

robert
>
>-- 
>Robert Haas
>EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>The Enterprise Postgres Company
>
>-- 
>Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20100922230531.ALE43726@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
Permalink:  ../20100922230531.ALE43726@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20100922230531.ALE43726@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gnuoytr@rcn.com
  Subject: Re: Useless sort by
  In-Reply-To: <20100922230531.ALE43726@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox