From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Aaron Turner <synfinatic@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: large dataset with write vs read clients
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:02:08 -0400
Message-ID: <20101007190208.GB26232@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimNJc=0ffgRO_gO6Vsq06=aqBYXZouhbv0kBe-i@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimNJc=0ffgRO_gO6Vsq06=aqBYXZouhbv0kBe-i@mail.gmail.com>
* Aaron Turner (synfinatic@gmail.com) wrote:
> Basically, each connection is taking about 100MB resident
Errr.. Given that your shared buffers are around 100M, I think you're
confusing what you see in top with reality. The shared buffers are
visible in every process, but it's all the same actual memory, not 100M
per process.
Thanks,
Stephen
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 196B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, synfinatic@gmail.com
Subject: Re: large dataset with write vs read clients
In-Reply-To: <20101007190208.GB26232@tamriel.snowman.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox