From: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-pgsql-performance@apartia.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: best db schema for time series data?
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:07:30 +0100
Message-ID: <20101116110729.GA30848@apartia.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinxevRJ0kg5wZ6opDeQm17x6-t_wtZA4PKZQork@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20101116105055.GA26129@apartia.fr>
<AANLkTinxevRJ0kg5wZ6opDeQm17x6-t_wtZA4PKZQork@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> my opinion:
>
> @1 can be faster for access to last items with index
> @2 can be more effective about data files length allocation
Hi Pavel,
What is "data files length allocation" ?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: vindex+lists-pgsql-performance@apartia.org
Subject: Re: best db schema for time series data?
In-Reply-To: <20101116110729.GA30848@apartia.fr>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox