From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Does exclusive locking improve performance?
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:18:35 -0500
Message-ID: <20110217051835.GU4116@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <666FB8D75E95AE42965A0E76A5E5337E06D966C6FD@prdlsmmsg01.ad.linz.govt.nz>
References: <666FB8D75E95AE42965A0E76A5E5337E06D966C6FD@prdlsmmsg01.ad.linz.govt.nz>
* Jeremy Palmer (JPalmer@linz.govt.nz) wrote:
> In normal circumstances does locking a table in access exclusive mode improve insert, update and delete operation performance on that table.
>
> Is MVCC disabled or somehow has less work to do?
MVCC certainly isn't disabled. Does it have less work to do? That's a
bit harder to say but my guess is "not so much that you'd actually be
able to notice it."..
Thanks,
Stephen
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, JPalmer@linz.govt.nz
Subject: Re: Does exclusive locking improve performance?
In-Reply-To: <20110217051835.GU4116@tamriel.snowman.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox