pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Does exclusive locking improve performance?
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Does exclusive locking improve performance?
@ 2011-02-17 04:38 Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>
  2011-02-17 05:18 ` Re: Does exclusive locking improve performance? Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Jeremy Palmer @ 2011-02-17 04:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-performance

In normal circumstances does locking a table in access exclusive mode improve insert, update and delete operation performance on that table.

Is MVCC disabled or somehow has less work to do?

Cheers
Jeremy

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

This message contains information, which is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message.
If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately (Phone 0800 665 463 or info@linz.govt.nz) and destroy the original message.
LINZ accepts no responsibility for changes to this email, or for any attachments, after its transmission from LINZ.

Thank you.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Does exclusive locking improve performance?
  2011-02-17 04:38 Does exclusive locking improve performance? Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>
@ 2011-02-17 05:18 ` Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Stephen Frost @ 2011-02-17 05:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>; +Cc: pgsql-performance

* Jeremy Palmer (JPalmer@linz.govt.nz) wrote:
> In normal circumstances does locking a table in access exclusive mode improve insert, update and delete operation performance on that table.
> 
> Is MVCC disabled or somehow has less work to do?

MVCC certainly isn't disabled.  Does it have less work to do?  That's a
bit harder to say but my guess is "not so much that you'd actually be
able to notice it."..

	Thanks,

		Stephen

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197B) download

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-17 05:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-17 04:38 Does exclusive locking improve performance? Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>
2011-02-17 05:18 ` Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox