pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gnuoytr@rcn.com
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: Wed,  6 Apr 2011 23:19:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <201104070319.060633@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9D27D0.9040800@boreham.org>
References: <4D90EDB6.2080609@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<4D9A6FB6.2000702@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<4D9D1FC3.4020207@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<4D9D27D0.9040800@boreham.org>

SSDs have been around for quite some time.  The first that I've found is Texas Memory.  Not quite 1977, but not flash either, although they've been doing so for a couple of years.  

http://www.ramsan.com/company/history

---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:56:16 -0600
>From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org (on behalf of David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Intel SSDs that may not suck  
>To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>
>Had to say a quick thanks to Greg and the others who have posted 
>detailed test results on SSDs here.
>For those of us watching for the inflection point where we can begin the 
>transition from mechanical to solid state storage, this data and 
>experience is invaluable. Thanks for sharing it.
>
>A short story while I'm posting : my Dad taught electronics engineering 
>and would often visit the local factories with groups of students. I 
>remember in particular after a visit to a disk drive manufacturer 
>(Burroughs), in 1977 he came home telling me that he'd asked the plant 
>manager what their plan was once solid state storage made their products 
>obsolete. The manager looked at him like he was form another planet...
>
>So I've been waiting patiently 34 years for this hopefully 
>soon-to-arrive moment ;)
>
>
>
>-- 
>Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (35+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <201104070319.060633@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
Permalink:  ../201104070319.060633@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/201104070319.060633@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gnuoytr@rcn.com
  Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
  In-Reply-To: <201104070319.060633@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox