pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gnuoytr@rcn.com
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: FUSION-IO io cards
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:45:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <201104291445.061769@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikdOoUZyvcNEXk67563tf7c78ZGUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikdOoUZyvcNEXk67563tf7c78ZGUQ@mail.gmail.com>

Fusion SSDs install on PCIe slots, so are limited by slot count.  None, so far as I recall, are bootable (although Fusion has been promising that for more than a year).  If you've a BCNF schema of moderate size, then any SSD as primary store is a good option; Fusion's are just even faster.  If you've got the typical flatfile bloated schema, then while SSD will be faster (if you've got the $$$), PCIe is not likely to have sufficient capacity.

SSD is the reason to refactor to a Dr. Coddian schema.  Few have taken the opportunity.

regards,
Robert


---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:24:48 -0400
>From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org (on behalf of Mark Steben <mark.steben@autorevenue.com>)
>Subject: [PERFORM] FUSION-IO io cards  
>To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>
>   Hi,
>   Had a recent conversation with a tech from this
>   company called FUSION-IO. They sell
>    io cards designed to replace conventional disks. 
>   The cards can be up to 3 TB in size and apparently
>   are installed in closer proximity to the CPU than
>   the disks are.  They claim
>   performance boosts several times better than the
>   spinning disks.
>
>   Just wondering if anyone has had any experience with
>   this company and these
>   cards.  We're currently at postgres 8.3.11. 
>
>   Any insights / recommendations appreciated.  thank
>   you,
>
>   --
>
>   Mark Steben
>   Database Administrator
>   @utoRevenue  |  Autobase  |  AVV
>   The CRM division of Dominion Dealer Solutions
>   95D Ashley Avenue
>   West Springfield,  MA  01089
>   t: 413.327.3045
>   f: 413.732.1824
>   w: www.autorevenue.com



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <201104291445.061769@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
Permalink:  ../201104291445.061769@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/201104291445.061769@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gnuoytr@rcn.com
  Subject: Re: FUSION-IO io cards
  In-Reply-To: <201104291445.061769@ms14.lnh.mail.rcn.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox