From: ktm@rice.edu <ktm@rice.edu>
To: Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: DBD-Pg prepared statement versus plain execution
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:59:30 -0500
Message-ID: <20120321125930.GA7440@aart.rice.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F69B9B3.7030303@usit.uio.no>
References: <4F69B9B3.7030303@usit.uio.no>
Hi Rafael,
Try disabling the prepare statement processing in DBD::Pg and
try the timing runs again.
Regards,
Ken
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:21:23PM +0100, Rafael Martinez wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
>
> We are having some performance problems with an application that uses
> prepared statement heavily.
>
> We have found out that it creates-executes-destroys a prepared statement
> *per* statement it sends to the database (pg-9.1) via DBD-Pg.
>
> A normal log entry for a sql-statement looks e.g. like this:
> - ----------------------------------------------------------
> [2012-03-15 14:49:12.484 CET] LOG: duration: 8.440 ms parse
> dbdpg_p32048_3:
>
> SELECT DISTINCT ACL.RightName FROM ACL, Principals, CachedGroupMembers
> WHERE Principals.id = ACL.PrincipalId AND Principals.PrincipalType =
> 'Group' AND Principals.Disabled = 0 AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId =
> ACL.PrincipalId AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId = Principals.id AND
> CachedGroupMembers.MemberId = 19312 AND CachedGroupMembers.Disabled = 0
> AND ((ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1) OR
> (ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1))
>
> [2012-03-15 14:49:12.485 CET] LOG: duration: 0.087 ms bind
> dbdpg_p32048_3:
>
> SELECT DISTINCT ACL.RightName FROM ACL, Principals, CachedGroupMembers
> WHERE Principals.id = ACL.PrincipalId AND Principals.PrincipalType =
> 'Group' AND Principals.Disabled = 0 AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId =
> ACL.PrincipalId AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId = Principals.id AND
> CachedGroupMembers.MemberId = 19312 AND CachedGroupMembers.Disabled = 0
> AND ((ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1) OR
> (ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1))
>
>
> [2012-03-15 14:49:12.487 CET] LOG: duration: 1.692 ms execute
> dbdpg_p32048_3:
>
> SELECT DISTINCT ACL.RightName FROM ACL, Principals, CachedGroupMembers
> WHERE Principals.id = ACL.PrincipalId AND Principals.PrincipalType =
> 'Group' AND Principals.Disabled = 0 AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId =
> ACL.PrincipalId AND CachedGroupMembers.GroupId = Principals.id AND
> CachedGroupMembers.MemberId = 19312 AND CachedGroupMembers.Disabled = 0
> AND ((ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1) OR
> (ACL.ObjectType = 'RT::System' AND ACL.ObjectId = 1))
>
>
> [2012-03-15 14:49:12.488 CET] LOG: duration: 0.029 ms statement:
> DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p32048_3
> - ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> As you can see, the parse+bind+deallocate part uses much more time than
> the execution part. This is the same for many of the statements send to
> the database.
>
> My question is:
>
> Is the parse+bind time reported, a time (not reported) that the planer
> will use anyway when running a sql-statement in a normal way or the
> parse+bind+deallocate time is *extra* time needed by the prepared statement?
>
> Can we assume that running this application without using prepared
> statements will do that it runs faster the time used by
> parse+bind+deallocate?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> regards,
> - --
> Rafael Martinez Guerrero
> Center for Information Technology
> University of Oslo, Norway
>
> PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk9pubAACgkQBhuKQurGihTYkwCcCFYQRDGWD0yaR+f2FFwKs7gN
> RfgAoJdPrAzUhfBfsXmst7/l7LVLisHy
> =l7Fl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ktm@rice.edu, r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no
Subject: Re: DBD-Pg prepared statement versus plain execution
In-Reply-To: <20120321125930.GA7440@aart.rice.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox