From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: heavly load system spec
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:04:05 -0400
Message-ID: <20120524210405.GR1267@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoYzt7gR3KWBBTM6RB0QUkBx++7ovz7qFUDnKLGFKaMCfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJY59_jeC1r5LYOk05UiL5BE+C=WQAVD17+LU93q2CLSvh4Umg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoYzt7gR3KWBBTM6RB0QUkBx++7ovz7qFUDnKLGFKaMCfg@mail.gmail.com>
Gregg,
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I know this is a very general question. But if you guys had to specify
> > system (could be one server or cluster), with sustainable transaction
> > rate of 1.5M tps running postgresql, what configuration and hardware
> > would you be looking for ?
> > The transaction distribution there is 90% writes/updates and 10% reads.
> > We're talking 64 linux, Intel/IBM system.
Just to clarify/verify, you're looking for a system which can handle
1.35M write transactions per second? That's quite a few and regardless
of RDBMS, I expect you'll need quite an I/O system to handle that.
Thanks,
Stephen
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com, gryzman@gmail.com
Subject: Re: heavly load system spec
In-Reply-To: <20120524210405.GR1267@tamriel.snowman.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox